Comprehensive Approaches to Worker Protection
Tab Group Heading link
APHA Policy Language
While decent work calls for a comprehensive approach to work and worker health, the United States has a “splintered” approach to labor, with enormous gaps in coverage for basic labor rights and sporadic programs by different levels of government and nongovernmental organizations that fail to provide comprehensive solutions.
Examples of Topic Areas
- Workers Excluded from OSHA, FLSA, and/or NLRA
- Agricultural Workers
- Domestic Workers
- Self-Employed “Contractors”
- Public Employees
- Worker Misclassification
- Weak regulatory protections
- Gaps in collection of work-relateddata/research
- Measures of wellbeing
- Measures of underemployment
- Inclusion of emerging precarious jobs
- Measure impact of stresses
- Measure effectiveness of interventions
- Co-enforcement of labor standards
- Agricultural Workers
- Domestic Workers
- Self-Employed “Contractors”
- Public Employees
- Measures of wellbeing
- Measures of underemployment
- Inclusion of emerging precarious jobs
- Measure impact of stresses
- Measure effectiveness of interventions
PHQ
- What are some of the public health impacts of underemployment in the United States?
- What has been the impact of the domestic worker protections that
some states and municipalities have adopted?
- Have co-enforcement models lead to safer workplaces?
- What is the impact of hospital staffing mandates on worker safety and injury rates?
- How would granting work permits to undocumented migrants benefit all workers?
some states and municipalities have adopted?